From assessments to insights

Turn assessment data
into hiring intelligence

Bring every assessment into a clearer view of skills, strengths and review context — so your team can hire with confidence.

See insights in action Explore sample report

Performance overview

78%Overall score

Technical skills82
Problem solving76
Communication71
Answer quality79
Integrity contextReview

Candidate cohort

Read chart data

Most example candidate scores fall between 55 and 80. The sample benchmark peaks around 50.

Candidate cohort — illustrative data
Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Skill distribution

Read chart data

Example skill distribution compares candidate and benchmark scores across JavaScript, Python, SQL, System Design and communication.

Skill distribution — illustrative data
Skill	Candidates	Benchmark
JS	76	58
Python	82	65
SQL	68	52
System Design	90	68
Comms	78	64

Role fit analysis

92%Example fit

Backend Engineer

76%Example fit

Product Analyst

68%Example fit

Full Stack Engineer

Illustrative sample report · All scores, cohorts, fit indicators and signals on this page are example data.

Candidate data

Answers, scores and assessment context

Structured analysis

Patterns, benchmarks and skill comparisons

Actionable insights

Clear evidence for human-led decisions

Performance landscape

A complete view
of candidate performance

Go beyond a single score. Explore skill distribution, cohort trends and role-based patterns to understand how candidates perform across different dimensions.

1,248Candidates assessed

12Roles analysed

28Skills measured

Score distribution

Read chart data

Most example candidate scores fall between 55 and 80. The sample benchmark peaks around 50.

Score distribution — illustrative data
Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Cohort trends

Read chart data

In this illustrative cohort, technical skills rise from 48 to 84 across six months, while communication rises from 32 to 59.

Cohort trends — illustrative data
Month	Technical skills	Communication	Problem solving
Jan	48	32	42
Feb	54	38	47
Mar	68	42	59
Apr	72	46	62
May	79	53	67
Jun	84	59	73

Performance by role

Read chart data

Example overall performance by role: Backend Engineer 82, Data Analyst 76, Product Manager 71 and Full Stack Engineer 78.

Performance by role — illustrative data
Role	Technical	Problem solving	Communication	Total
Backend Engineer	35	22	25	82
Data Analyst	30	24	22	76
Product Manager	28	20	23	71
Full Stack Engineer	33	22	23	78

Skill spread across candidates

Read chart data

Each range shows minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and maximum sample scores. JavaScript has a median of 76; System Design has a median of 64.

Skill spread across candidates — illustrative data
Skill	Min	Lower quartile	Median	Upper quartile	Max
JavaScript	24	51	76	83	94
Python	30	46	72	81	92
SQL	18	42	68	79	88
System Design	16	33	64	72	84
Communication	28	49	70	82	95

Hiring signals

Spot patterns, not just scores

Identify skill strengths, recurring gaps and meaningful patterns across your candidate pool. Use them as a starting point for a closer review.

Candidate skill clusters

Read chart data

The example scatter plot groups candidates by technical and problem-solving scores. Clusters describe score patterns, not personality, potential or hiring decisions.

Candidate skill clusters — illustrative data
Sample group	Technical skills	Problem solving
Higher scores	80	81
Higher scores	82	77
Higher scores	75	74
Higher scores	87	83
Higher scores	72	80
Higher scores	87	70
Higher scores	75	82
Higher scores	81	85
Higher scores	82	68
Higher scores	76	76
Higher scores	86	81
Higher scores	73	76
Higher scores	87	75
Higher scores	75	83
Higher scores	81	79
Higher scores	84	70
Higher scores	77	83
Higher scores	85	84
Higher scores	74	68
Higher scores	86	78
Higher scores	76	81
Higher scores	81	76
Higher scores	83	75
Higher scores	73	84
Higher scores	84	78
Higher scores	75	71
Higher scores	85	84
Higher scores	76	83
Higher scores	82	67
Higher scores	82	79
Higher scores	74	81
Higher scores	90	75
Higher scores	76	76
Higher scores	85	84
Higher scores	76	77
Higher scores	82	71
Developing strengths	52	60
Developing strengths	46	54
Developing strengths	50	58
Developing strengths	51	63
Developing strengths	43	53
Developing strengths	57	54
Developing strengths	39	67
Developing strengths	59	56
Developing strengths	47	48
Developing strengths	50	67
Developing strengths	51	59
Developing strengths	44	54
Developing strengths	56	59
Developing strengths	40	63
Developing strengths	58	53
Developing strengths	42	55
Developing strengths	50	67
Developing strengths	50	55
Developing strengths	45	49
Developing strengths	55	68
Developing strengths	41	59
Developing strengths	57	54
Developing strengths	42	60
Developing strengths	52	63
Developing strengths	50	52
Developing strengths	46	56
Developing strengths	54	67
Developing strengths	42	54
Developing strengths	56	50
Developing strengths	43	69
Developing strengths	52	58
Developing strengths	50	54
Developing strengths	47	61
Developing strengths	53	62
Developing strengths	43	51
Developing strengths	56	58
Mixed results	70	29
Mixed results	61	27
Mixed results	71	34
Mixed results	62	31
Mixed results	68	23
Mixed results	68	34
Mixed results	60	36
Mixed results	76	21
Mixed results	62	29
Mixed results	71	42
Mixed results	62	28
Mixed results	68	28
Mixed results	67	35
Mixed results	61	30
Mixed results	75	23
Mixed results	55	35
Mixed results	70	35
Mixed results	62	20
Mixed results	68	31
Mixed results	67	41
Mixed results	62	28
Mixed results	74	28
Mixed results	56	35
Mixed results	77	29
Mixed results	63	24
Mixed results	68	36
Mixed results	66	34
Mixed results	63	20
Mixed results	72	32
Mixed results	57	40
Mixed results	76	28
Mixed results	58	29
Mixed results	68	35
Mixed results	66	28
Mixed results	63	24
Mixed results	71	37
Review opportunities	25	27
Review opportunities	21	31
Review opportunities	29	34
Review opportunities	17	26
Review opportunities	32	27
Review opportunities	18	38
Review opportunities	27	28
Review opportunities	25	22
Review opportunities	22	39
Review opportunities	28	34
Review opportunities	18	27
Review opportunities	31	31
Review opportunities	18	34
Review opportunities	28	25
Review opportunities	24	28
Review opportunities	19	38
Review opportunities	27	26
Review opportunities	19	23
Review opportunities	30	40
Review opportunities	19	32
Review opportunities	27	27
Review opportunities	24	32
Review opportunities	20	33
Review opportunities	32	25
Review opportunities	20	29
Review opportunities	29	38
Review opportunities	19	25
Review opportunities	27	24
Review opportunities	24	40
Review opportunities	21	30
Review opportunities	31	27
Review opportunities	14	32
Review opportunities	28	33
Review opportunities	20	24
Review opportunities	27	30
Review opportunities	23	37

Key hiring signals

Strong technical foundation32% of this sample cohort scores 80 or above across core technical skills.

Review the underlying questions and role requirements before treating a high score as evidence of readiness.

Clear higher-score clusterA group of candidates scores consistently across multiple dimensions.

Use the cluster chart to explore score patterns. Group membership is descriptive and does not predict future performance.

Common skill gapsSystem design is a recurring area to explore in this example cohort.

Check question difficulty, scoring criteria and assessment relevance before drawing conclusions about a gap.

Communication adds contextWritten responses can add useful evidence alongside technical marks.

Review communication using a consistent, role-relevant rubric, with the same criteria for each candidate.

Benchmarking

Benchmark performance with context

Compare candidates against role expectations and sample cohort averages to understand the evidence in context.

Candidate vs benchmark

Read chart data

For the Backend Engineer example, the candidate scores 78 in technical skills and 82 in problem solving. Benchmarks are illustrative.

Candidate vs benchmark — illustrative data
Skill	Candidate	Benchmark	Higher-score sample
Technical skills	78	75	90
Problem solving	82	78	92
Communication	68	70	85
System design	74	68	88
Answer quality	80	76	91

Score comparison

Read chart data

For the Backend Engineer example, the candidate scores 78 in technical skills and 82 in problem solving. Benchmarks are illustrative.

Score comparison — illustrative data
Skill	Candidate	Benchmark	Higher-score sample
Technical skills	78	75	90
Problem solving	82	78	92
Communication	68	70	85
System design	74	68	88
Answer quality	80	76	91

Role fit summary

82%Example fit

In this illustrative report, the candidate shows relative strengths in problem solving and technical implementation. A fit indicator supports review; it does not replace it.

Key takeawayReview strengths, gaps and assessment relevance before making a decision.

Make your assessment data
work harder for your team.

Book a demo

Candidate cohort — illustrative data

Score

Your candidates

Sample benchmark

105

133

157

174

165

125

100

Skill distribution — illustrative data

Skill

Candidates

Benchmark

Python

SQL

System Design

Comms

Score distribution — illustrative data

Score

Your candidates

Sample benchmark

105

133

157

174

165

125

100

Cohort trends — illustrative data

Month

Technical skills

Communication

Problem solving

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Performance by role — illustrative data

Role

Technical

Problem solving

Communication

Total

Backend Engineer

Data Analyst

Product Manager

Full Stack Engineer

Skill spread across candidates — illustrative data

Skill

Min

Lower quartile

Median

Upper quartile

Max

JavaScript

Python

SQL

System Design

Communication

Candidate skill clusters — illustrative data

Sample group

Technical skills

Problem solving

Higher scores

Developing strengths

Mixed results

Review opportunities

Candidate vs benchmark — illustrative data

Skill

Candidate

Benchmark

Higher-score sample

Technical skills

Problem solving

Communication

System design

Answer quality

Score comparison — illustrative data

Skill

Candidate

Benchmark

Higher-score sample

Technical skills

Problem solving

Communication

System design

Answer quality

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Turn assessment datainto hiring intelligence

Performance overview

Role fit analysis

Candidate data

Structured analysis

Actionable insights

A complete viewof candidate performance

Spot patterns, not just scores

Benchmark performance with context

Role fit summary

Make your assessment datawork harder for your team.

Turn assessment datainto hiring intelligence

Performance overview

Role fit analysis

Candidate data

Structured analysis

Actionable insights

A complete viewof candidate performance

Spot patterns, not just scores

Benchmark performance with context

Role fit summary

Make your assessment datawork harder for your team.

Turn assessment data
into hiring intelligence

A complete view
of candidate performance

Make your assessment data
work harder for your team.

Turn assessment data
into hiring intelligence

A complete view
of candidate performance

Make your assessment data
work harder for your team.

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0

Score	Your candidates	Sample benchmark
0	0	0
5	4	1
10	8	3
15	0	7
20	4	14
25	9	26
30	4	43
35	15	64
40	33	84
45	50	99
50	89	105
55	133	99
60	157	84
65	174	64
70	165	43
75	125	26
80	89	14
85	58	7
90	25	3
95	15	1
100	12	0